Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coaxial\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coaxial\s+Antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Coaxial Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:35:30 -0400; At present, I have a horizontal loop for 6 meters at about 20'. Six has had a lot of openings lately so I thought I'd play with a small yagi. In searching the web, I ran across an article for buildin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00411.html (9,294 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Coaxial Antennas (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:58:39 -0700; If you look closely at these N0KHQ-type antennas, you will see that they are center-loaded by the inductance of two shorted sections of transmission line. I visualize it this way: The current on each; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00562.html (9,916 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Coaxial Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <W8JI@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 23:35:09 -0400; That's true. Many people assume coaxial stubs are low loss loading systems, but they really are not. They are worse than linear loading. I certainly agree with that also!!! It's likely just sheer lu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00576.html (8,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]