Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Comments\s+on\s+Antenna\s+Peformance\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Comments\s+on\s+Antenna\s+Peformance\s+$long$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Comments on Antenna Peformance (long) (score: 1): Author: ji3m@maxwell.com (James R. Duffey); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 09:40:48 -0700; I have been following the recent discussions of Mosley and KT-34XA performance on the list with great interest. I am always amazed at how rapidly a topic can change in a thread; the post that started; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00352.html (13,288 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Comments on Antenna Peformance (long) (score: 1): Author: DavidHarper@tx.slr.com (DavidHarper@tx.slr.com); Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 14:28:55 -0600; Duffey sez: (snip) This may be true with respect to gain, as you say. However, isn't the opposite true with respect to SWR? Most SWR curves are steeper on the low end, so that an antenna that is adju; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00356.html (8,806 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Comments on Antenna Peformance (long) (score: 1): Author: larsenp@cadvision.com (Peter Larsen); Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 04:03:18 +0000; This probably explains why at times my 5 watt station beats out one of the local stations running 100 watts. Both stations have 3 elem tri-banders. Mine at 64 feet, and his at 48 feet. VE6NAO/QRP --; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00361.html (8,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]