Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Common\-mode\s+choke\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Common\-mode\s+choke\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:42:37 -0500 (CDT); when you run out of money from the sounds of it! fwiw, I have no big chokes on any of my beams, or any feedlines into the shack, or anywhere else for that matter... and only random wound coax coils; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00387.html (8,705 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:53:19 -0700; You may be blessed with a very quiet location. Good for you. Most of us are not. The high choking Z does two things. It prevents the feedline from filling in the nulls in the pattern, and it provides; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00388.html (8,727 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:58:12 -0700; See the tutorial. The higher choking Z provides better "worst case" noise suppression and greater power handling (because it reduces the worst case common mode current). Steve is showing 1100 ohms re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00389.html (9,899 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:14:03 +0200; I don´t believe in that higher power rating 73 Peter everywhere... so what am I missing???? You may be blessed with a very quiet location. Good for you. Most of us are not. The high choking Z does tw; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00390.html (9,027 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:02:57 -0700; 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00394.html (9,390 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:12:53 -0500; How does one give a yes or no when the question's answer can most accurately be distilled down to "it depends." 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie 73, Jim K9YC _____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00397.html (10,043 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:14:05 +0100; Gerald, To a large extent the desirable high resistive component is inherent in the choice of core material, but the stray capacitance can also give useful benefit. Here's an example: A single turn o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00402.html (10,457 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]