- 1. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:02:48 -0500 (EST)
- Comparing antennas is one of those things we all do. We compare them to our buddy across town or even our buddy 750 miles away. Well, this week I did some interesting comparisions. As you might know,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00449.html (8,636 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike)
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 13:10:03 -0600
- Just my 2 cents worth. I have a TH7 and a C3. The Th7 is at 50 feet and the C3 is at 80. They are separated by about 100 feet. In every instance the C3 has been the better antenna. This applies to no
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00678.html (7,986 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart)
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 21:54:33 +0100
- that's a big difference in height! Were you comparing on 20 or 10? I might buy that on 10 but certainly not on 20. There is a huge difference between my KT34XA at 38 and the one at 72 feet on 20, but
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00685.html (9,318 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike)
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 16:01:33 -0600
- Like I said over time the C3 wins out. I realize 30 feet is a big difference. But the so called gain of the Th7 is far greater than the C3....My point is that These huge trapped antennas may not be a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00686.html (7,311 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Comparisons (score: 1)
- Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:24:50 EDT
- I have commented on this before... Manyfacturers and their marketing managers undestand this phenomenon and capitalize on it... Here we have a half wave height difference, in favor of the new antenna
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00712.html (7,392 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu