Folks, Many of us really appreciate the great exchange of knowledge and wisdom of grounding techniques and tips...It is interesting to see the variety of opinions among wise men to the topic. I stumb
Generally nice presentation, however, a few nit-picky questions that raise some issues. 1) The data is presented without sources (this is important, because grounding philosophies, and requirements,
This is hardly comprehensive. Lot's of details left. Other have also pointed this out. I would recommend a TIA/EIA document or similar. 73 Jim W7RY At 07:17 AM 2/6/2005, Pat Barthelow wrote: Folks, M
I suppose the problems with TIA/EIA or IEEE documents are the following: 1) Too much detail (nobody really wants to read a 200+ page document) 2) Not specific to ham applications (we're not grounding
That's because meaningless and/or unsupported data shouldn't be called comprehensive. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wi
Responding to Jim (but not sure which one!) -- You say "That's why I was thinking that coming up with a suitable peer-reviewed document aimed directly at hams would be useful. Not an application note
At 09:50 AM 2/7/2005, Martin AA6E wrote: Responding to Jim (but not sure which one!) -- You say "That's why I was thinking that coming up with a suitable peer-reviewed document aimed directly at hams