Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Concrete\s+Fiber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Concrete\s+Fiber\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:53:58 -0400; I'm about to order concrete for a tower base. The concrete company offers fiber reinforcement mixed into the concrete for about $10 per cubic yard. I've researched concrete fiber and found nothing on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00607.html (9,222 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: kr7x@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:15:12 +0000; Doug: Fiber reinforced concrete is not, in my professional opinion, going to provide any advantage in real terms for its additional cost for a tower foundation. The biggest benefit it would provide i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00612.html (9,594 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:25:28 EDT; This sounds like a version on concrete mix sold around here called "Maximizer" I notice on the bag it claims to yield a somewhat higher volume of concrete per bag of mix. This higher volume comes at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00613.html (10,555 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: el34guy@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:33:27 -0400; I just poured 21 yards a few weeks ago and used the regular 4000-4500lb stuff. It didnt seem necessary to use the fibre grade. But, as all guys do we talked a lot about and came to that conclusion. G; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00614.html (11,092 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "Orcena Lyle" <olyle@cpinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:14:30 -0500; I haven't had concrete fiber in a tower base but it is in my new driveway. A tree fell on my new garage last June, meaning a roof and wall replacement (one wall). So the new fiber driveway had a dump; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00615.html (10,971 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:19:30 -0500; I would use it for my next driveway/slab. I would NOT use it for a tower base. Not only is it a waste of money, it is not appropriate for a tower base since the specs for a tower base do not call for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00616.html (12,255 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:16:05 -0400; I would use it for my next driveway/slab. I would NOT use it for a tower base. Not only is it a waste of money, it is not appropriate for a tower base since the specs for a tower base do not call for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00618.html (13,507 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:18:02 -0700; I worked with concrete contractors for years. They said the "engineers" love it, but the people who deal with it day in and day out said it does NOTHING for the concrete. They said, and I witnessed,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00619.html (11,089 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:34:08 +0000; The County required the fiber for the house slab, they also required 3500PSI. While they were here we had them pour the tower base, driveway slab, and 18" sills around the house (so water off the ro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00622.html (10,823 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <ooe@odessaoffice.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:51:56 -0700; I just put in over 600 square feet of new floor space and 70+ feet of sidewalk at my house and we put a 20x19 floor in the garage at my new office. I put fiber in all of it. It's now called microfibe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00623.html (14,141 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:33:09 -0400; Thanks to everyone for their comments and experiences. I decided to not use the fiber because of lightning concerns. My tower base is a welded rebar cage (Tri-Ex LM-354HDSP), so the base will act as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00630.html (9,425 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "RJD" <nj9k@wi.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:42:09 -0000; My antennas/tower took a glancing blow of lightning back in 2000 on the Sunday night just back from Dayton and the block displayed no damage. I also have my rebar welded as a cage inside the 5x5x8 ho; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00632.html (10,214 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Fiber (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:54:51 -0400; I sure wouldn't worry about it affectin lightening damage. http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/tower.htm My tower went up late 2000 to early 2001 with the antennas and mast being installed late in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00640.html (13,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]