Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Concrete\s+instead\s+of\s+Cadwelding\s+possible\s+solution\s+in\s+soil\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Concrete instead of Cadwelding possible solution in soil? (score: 1)
Author: Beat Meier <mbe_ml@swiss-wireless.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:21:09 -0300
If the concrete is such a good conductor and prevents corrosion of iron could I use concrete instead of cad welding to put groundroad and ground wire together? This would be a very cheap solution if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00356.html (7,000 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete instead of Cadwelding possible solution in soil? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:54:46 -0700
concrete may be a good conductor compared to random soil properties outside the concrete, but it's terrible compared to a solid metal joint. _______________________________________________ __________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00366.html (7,636 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete instead of Cadwelding possible solution in soil? (score: 1)
Author: Beat Meier <mbe_ml@swiss-wireless.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:49:04 -0300
What i meant of course is not that the concrete should replace the metal joint but in soil the metal joint of clamps oxidate in short time or not? So the idea is to protect the junction from the clam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00375.html (8,112 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete instead of Cadwelding possible solution in soil? (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:29:44 -0500
I don't believe concrete-encased connections are supported by the code. Cadweld connections are. That should be the simple answer. 73, Kelly Ve4xt --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00379.html (9,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu