Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crankup\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crankup\s+Towers\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:52:05 -0800; That sure would be nice. I think it is a safe bet to say that if it were practical to do that, we would already see towers being made that way. I have seen some military tubular masts that work that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00437.html (7,795 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:31:46 -0500; The cabling would be simple. The lift would be proportional the the weight and resistance to moving of each section. The natural tendency would be for the lighter sections to go up first and heavier; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00445.html (9,176 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:59:55 -0800; On UST towers, if the 2nd to bottom section is blocked by chaining it to the bottom section (which never moves), it will simply stall the winch. Nothing will move. Rick N6RK _________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00454.html (7,622 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:45:10 +0000; In the old country we solve this problem by mounting a 'head unit' atop the tower sections. Usually about a metre tall (that's three feet, give or take) it houses the rotator platform and is thus alw; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00455.html (7,412 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: "K0DAN" <k0dan@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:13:35 -0600; Some do, some don't. Most of my experience is with Tri-Ex towers (now Tash). One I had had a single cable which would extend 4 sections one at a time to about 70' height, when ne section was fully ex; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00456.html (8,945 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankup towers (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:05:42 -0600; I finally got upright a HG-52-SS tower this afternoon. It has an electric winch on it that is labelled WSI Wilson Systems Inc. 110V and I'm trying to decide whether to check it out or replace it with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00457.html (7,692 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]