- 1. [TowerTalk] Crankups - pros (score: 1)
- Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:23:24 -0500
- I agree with the negatives about crankups given. Also, less windload -- limited by the lack of guys -- it's self-supporting -- and the smaller diameter of the top section. In favor of them: Greater s
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00402.html (7,535 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankups - pros (score: 1)
- Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:54:31 -0600
- And, in my world, a good installation still requires periodic maintenance, still encounters corrosion, bird droppings, cables need to be replaced, new antennas get added, etc., etc. And, if things go
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00404.html (9,161 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Crankups - pros (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:32:28 -0500
- I'd like a big self supporting crank-up but it'd stay up except for sever weather or maintenance. Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2 www.rogerhals
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00420.html (9,277 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu