Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crimper\s+for\s+Belden\s+9913\s+\-\s+Response\s+DAVIS\s+RF\s+Co\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 01:26:25 -0500
Mark, Ctr. conductor size for 9913 and 9913F7 is .108", so spec'g the .116 die makes sense. however, my crimper source indicates that their .128" is the one to use for 9913. This may not be as odd as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00065.html (10,229 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Thank you !     I appriceate this. Regards Mark VE7AFZ Mark,  Ctr. conductor size for 9913 and 9913F7 is .108", so spec'g the .116 die makes sense.  however, my crimper source indicates that their .1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00066.html (11,203 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:34:13 EST
Perhaps the .128" size is defined by the o.d. of the center pin which naturally is larger than the center conductor? 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 1/4/2009 12:26:53 A.M. Central Standard Time, s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00076.html (10,767 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:58:22 -0500
Mark, One of my affiliates that does cable assembly/terminations indicates that the .128 is not a good die to use, unless you tin the ctr conductor and find it to be a tight fit after crimping. They
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00102.html (11,986 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:49:14 -0500
A thought here: I think he's talking about the flexible version with the stranded center conductor which like the LMR-400UF is a bit larger than the solid center conductor. Although I've always been
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00105.html (14,767 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:01:02 -0500
Hi Roger, The ctr. cond. on LMR 400 (solid) and 400 UF (strnd'd) are both .108; however, cutting the ctr cond of the stranded 400 UF , AFTER removing the dielectric will expand the OD....and sometime
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00109.html (18,034 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:50:24 -0500
Roger is an "Old Crimper," for sure !!! (sorry Roger, I could not resist poking some some fun!) == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00110.html (8,298 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:05:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1296860631-1231247136=:69853" --0-1296860631-1231247136=:69853 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encodin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00112.html (34,965 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Sorry not sure what happened with the formatting here..  I'll try again.. Steve With regards to the center conductor expanding if it is cut after removing the dielectric, I have noticed this with 991
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00113.html (36,250 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:31:18 -0800
Hey Mark, Email reflectors are read by people with a wide variety of email software. Because I subscribe to a lot of public lists, I purposely use email software that I can set to avoid viruses and o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00115.html (29,401 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:13:36 -0500
Hi Mark, If you have made your clean cut of the dielectric, then try pulling off the dielectric straight in line with the plane of the center conductor, but twist it as you are pulling it off, the tw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00117.html (18,137 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co. (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Aycock" <baycock@hughes.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:39:42 -0600
JIM-- The subject of your post was *not* "Crimper for Belden 9913 - Response DAVIS RF Co." If you are the "list Police", follow the common rules, stick to the thread defined by the subject. Bill-W4BS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00119.html (35,846 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu