Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cubic\s+Quad\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cubic\s+Quad\s+Antennas\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cubic Quad Antennas (score: 1): Author: craig brammer <craigbrammer@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:59:49 -0800; Is anyone still doing HF Cubic Quad antennas on top of their towers? I am very curious as to what interactions happen when one considers the metal tower in the middle of the quad. Craig Brammer AE6AF; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00021.html (6,438 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cubic Quad Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Norm Duxbury" <duxburyn@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:37:45 -0500; There is no apparent interaction, Craig. If you feed your quad at the top or bottom it's horizontally polarized. Your tower is vertical. No interaction. Now, if you feed your quad at the side, that m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00024.html (8,178 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cubic Quad Antennas (score: 1): Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:03:46 -0800 (GMT-08:00); There's a Yahoo mailing list for Quads that you might want to check out: HAMQUADS@yahoogroups.com LJ --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00027.html (8,279 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cubic Quad Antennas (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:45:32 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I agree with Norm. I had a Cubex four element quad up for six years, fed at the bottom, and noticed no problems. A great antenna, by the way, but no fun to fix w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00028.html (7,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]