Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Current\s+imbalance\s+on\s+450\s+ohm\s+Ladder\s+Line\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Garry" <g.drummond@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:51:40 -0400
I have a 135' center fed dipole up at 50 feet strung between two trees in the clear fed with 108' of 450 ladder line. I am using a Palstar BT1500 balanced-L design antenna tuner. I also have an MFJ-8
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00235.html (7,508 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:03:24 -0400
My guess is that the balun on the tuner has insufficient impedance. Even a "balanced" tuner relies on the balun to force current balance... and if it's not an a balun with extremely high common mode
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00249.html (8,587 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:16:53 -0400
Not if it's a link-coupled balanced tuner. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00250.html (7,707 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:18:29 -0400
That's certainly true... but the Palstar unit mentioned isn't one. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00251.html (7,438 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:51:48 -0500
Sounds like it's time to check the calibration of your MFJ-835. Assuming an imbalance, reversing the polarity of the output terminals should simply show the same reading but on opposite channels. Rev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00258.html (10,197 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:27:32 -0400
If you have a current imbalance on open wire line, you have common mode current. Only in the perfectly balanced case (equal and opposite currents) is the line operating with differential mode curren
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00262.html (8,456 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:32:33 -0500
I agree with your conclusions Dan, and with your first explanation. Since you got me on that one, just for the sake of argument, I will pick on your last statement. ..."I think the meter is fine. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00266.html (9,815 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:20:03 -0400
Thanks for keeping me honest ;-) It's easy to have nonzero common mode and equal and opposite differential mode currents with coax and two seperate sources... just make current flow on the shield wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00269.html (9,445 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu