Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+A3S\s+vs\.\s+HyGain\s+Explorer\s+EX\-14\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A3S vs. HyGain Explorer EX-14 (score: 1)
Author: Rod Greene via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:40:27 +0000 (UTC)
All, I need to make some repairs to my CC A3S (at 50' with a KLM rotatable 40M above it) so will need to take it down. I have access to a HG EX-14 and could put it up instead. I haven't found any com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-09/msg00097.html (7,088 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A3S vs. HyGain Explorer EX-14 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:54:25 -0400
Any responses will be anecdotal, including mine, unless the two antennas were tested like in Champion Radio triband report. I have had big contest scores using a Cushcraft A3 from the Caribbean. It w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-09/msg00098.html (7,475 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A3S vs. HyGain Explorer EX-14 (score: 1)
Author: kostas sv1dpi <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 07:08:10 +0300
We had both in our club and exp14 is better than a3s. It is far better built also. Our antennas were original and not from mfj era 73 Kostas SV1DPI 21/9/2018 23:40, Rod Greene via TowerTalk : All, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-09/msg00100.html (8,224 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A3S vs. HyGain Explorer EX-14 (score: 1)
Author: Rod Greene via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks for the replies. I am going with repairs to the A3S. My reasons are as follows: - HyGain appears to be a better built antenna and several have said this.  But the boom lengths are similar and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-09/msg00101.html (9,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu