Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+A4S\s+Trap\s+Orientation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+A4S\s+Trap\s+Orientation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A4S Trap Orientation (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:46:29 -0700; A friend of mine was given an A4S that has a problem. The 10 Meter portion resonates at 41 MHz (using MFJ Antenna Analyzer). He thinks one of the 10 Meter traps may be installed backwards. Since all; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00252.html (6,779 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A4S Trap Orientation (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:26:56 -0500; The 10m portion of ANY trapped tri-bander is the aluminum between the traps. If it resonates at 41mHz, then something is distinctly wrong as that would require less than the required 10m spacing. Ins; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00253.html (7,980 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A4S Trap Orientation (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:58:40 -0500; Actually, it would lower the resonant frequency, no? -Rex Rex Lint, Consultant 26 Brek Drive Merrimack, NH 03054 PH: 603-860-7651 --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00298.html (9,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]