Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+Lightning\s+Arrestor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+Lightning\s+Arrestor\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: rthorne@arn.net (Richard Thorne); Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 08:20:55 -0500; Quick question. Does anybody know if the Cushcraft Lightning arrestor blocks DC? I want to use one in my system but it will be in line with the coax going to my remote coax switch. Its an Ameritron R; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00221.html (8,045 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (J.P. Kleinhaus); Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 11:04:45 -0400; A better question to ask is does the Cushcraft arrestor block lightning? :-) Seriously, they make more than one model, so you'd have to be more specific. I don't think any of them block DC, however.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00233.html (8,238 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 19:29:34 -0400 (EDT); Richard, The Cushcraft lightning arrestor has a DC Short from input to output. Furthermore, the ground that is on the ground post is only from the gas tube that is attached to only the center conduct; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00241.html (9,023 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 07:01:20 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> OK, I'll take the bait. I've seen that dc blocking stuff mentioned. Is it supposed to have something to do with lightning protection? 73, Tom W8JI w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com -; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00253.html (8,308 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 20:06:48 -0700; Yes. Most of the energy in a lightning strike is at dc and that's what causes the bulk of the damage. By dc blocking (which was a patent held by the PolyPhaser Corp until this past November) you prev; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00280.html (10,140 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 11:39:46 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Bob, Thanks. I'm trying to make sense of this stuff, but customary reliable sources have little data. I hope this is taken in the spirt that I write it, because I wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00289.html (11,854 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 23:53:48 +0000; WRONG! unless you consider a rise time from zero to maybe tens of thousand of amps in a couple microseconds DC. DC blocking would only help in blocking a slow build up of static such as occurs before; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00298.html (8,494 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 08:22:49 -0700; You are correct regarding there being energy into the gigahertz range existing due to quick rise times (usually 2 us). ENERGY at dc is the MAJOR component, however. Perhaps DAMAGING ENERGY would be m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00312.html (8,908 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Lightning Arrestor (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 00:25:07 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Bob, I appreciate your answer, but I never accept one source (especially without an explanation of how the information was gleaned) for critical data. Can you recall; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00328.html (8,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]