Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+ma160v\s+matching\s+coil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+ma160v\s+matching\s+coil\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft ma160v matching coil (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 19:58:45 -0700; Has anyone built their own coil for this antenna? With a lousy radial field you don't need a match. I installed a few more radials and now the swr has jumped and the bandwidth is tiny on this antenna; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00163.html (7,587 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft ma160v matching coil (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger <k2av@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:53:39 -0500; Oh yeah. SWR is sooo great when everything is lossy as all getout. More and more radials will show you where it's actually tuned, for sure. As to tuning method, text on ma160v at DX Engineering says; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00164.html (8,513 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft ma160v matching coil (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:23:50 -0700; I think you misunderstood. I have the directions from Cushcraft. If you put this antenna under a better radial field you need a matching system. One option is a shunt coil. I used the DXE example as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00165.html (9,496 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft ma160v matching coil (score: 1): Author: "jcjacobsen@q.com" <jcjacobsen@q.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:57:15 -0500 (EST); How do, Mike is having fun with an MA160v, trying to get a match............. Mike, I've got a H.B. coil loaded (@26' for 75, and then more coil at base for 160), 42' vertical for 160/75/40 and for a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00168.html (7,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]