Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:43:48 -0400
Hi Joe and others, Here is your loss data (below). Not sure how this will reproduce on TT, so, for ref., the .5 MHz = .065, the 10 MHz = .293; 30 = .512, etc. Although Commscope is a well built cable
I always thought that LDF-4 was a lot more fragile than the LMR series with the exception of the small stuff like the 240 series. I found it kinked much easier with normal handling around the shop or
Steve, many thanks for your reply regarding the Commscope SFX-500. Yours was the only reply that I received, and I have to conclude that Commscope is a new player in the coax game and that there is n
Commscope has been around for years, when I worked for At&t Broadband/Comcast Cable they were the preferred vender for the coax, mainly because they were a few cents cheaper than Times. Of course thi
Not only is Commscope *not* a new player in the coax game, they *own* Andrew, now. They have merged their aluminum-based, smooth conductor hardline with the Andrew line, while they concentrate on mai
Commscope is NOT a new player -- as I understand it, they were the spin-off of on of the major telecomms, maybe AT&T, 20 or so years ago. They may be new to hams, but they are NOT new. More than 5 ye
So I have now learned from several respondents. 73 and TNX to all, Joe K2XX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:49:44 -0400
Tnx John, as I noted in my initial to Joe, Commcast was bought by Andrew, as you point out. Joe, I didn't mean to imply that SFX cable was made in China, but today I checked with Commscope. They conf
Eupen is the way to go since Commscope bought Andrew. Nice stuff. Most of the carriers that like a good install are going to it on our towers. 73 Dave n4zkf --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounc