Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DRIVEN\s+VERSUS\s+PARASITIC\s+160\s+antenna\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:22:31 -0600
Hi Mike! I think both systems would give you outstanding results! My current 160 antenna has lots of radials (120 per element (5) that are 1/4 wavelength (137 feet) long = 75,000 feet of wire (radial
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00049.html (10,554 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 11:50:09 -0800
An interesting tradeoff appears here. Bandwidth vs directivity. If you allow adjustable matching & phasing elements (or adjustable elements) you can get both really good F/B AND operating bandwidth.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00052.html (8,734 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 05:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Well, remotely adjustable elements would allow the optimizing of gain and f/b across the band for a parasitic array.... It is certainly doable even on 160, but is it necessary? On 160 I rarely go abo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00083.html (7,721 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:11:02 -0800
There's an even easier way to control the length with air power. Rather than a knife switch, make the switch a plunger switch inside the tube. Imagine a tube with an air cylinder in the end, and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00084.html (8,844 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Makins" <tim.ei8ic@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:35:43 -0000
days Sounds like one of those tilt-switches from a pinball machine. They used mercury to bridge two contacts. Trouble is, on a windy day, you might find you were changing bands when you didn't want t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00090.html (8,320 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] DRIVEN VERSUS PARASITIC 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:28:59 -0800
You can do it very reliably. Not just a drop of liquid metal, you flood the area between the contacts. take a look at how they do "mercury contactors" used for quiet switching of big loads. You can d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00092.html (9,288 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu