Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+66\-Foot\s+Vertical\?\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:53:52 -0400
Oops... <snip> That should have said I should have close to a 1' overlap (+ 2 or 3" - 0) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00334.html (10,003 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:47:17 -0400
You might try www.tmastco.com. It is run by Henry, K4TMC, and stocks a variety of fiberglass and aluminum products that will meet your needs, probably for a lot less than you can build them yourself.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00335.html (16,691 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:09:13 -0400
My neighbor (W8LEP-sk) used rain down spouting for his vertical for many years. He stood it on an electric insulator that was attached to a 4X4 post buried and it lasted for many years. He had to guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00337.html (8,718 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:46:56 -0700
As a practical matter, fiberglass structural material (e.g. Extren) is about the same price as aluminum, about the same strength, but twice the flexibility. It's available in 20 foot lengths as tube,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00342.html (10,800 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:52:32 -0700
That's the usual thing (charging by actual length).. most metal places around here actually charge by the pound, plus a "per cut" fee (which can be quite low.. like $1/cut).. kind of depends on what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00343.html (10,871 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "larryjspammenot@teleport.com" <larryj@teleport.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
In this quest for a telescopic mast for supporting an inverted vee, the first one I ran into was the Spiderbeam "Aluminium Telescopic Mast 18m (60ft)". Yes, they spell it "aluminium" throughout the a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00363.html (19,119 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:55:09 -0500
I've used the fiberglass poles like the power company uses to reset breakers up high on poles. I sold a 30 foot one and have a 35 foot one here. Used it to support a number of wire antennas - the mos
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00364.html (20,968 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: k4tmc@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:39:34 -0400
Those are the "Hot Sticks" made by Hastings Fiberglass (yellow) and AB Chance (orange). Hastings has two versions, with round sections and triangular section (No Twist). Maximum heights are 35 and 40
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00367.html (21,640 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:15:26 -0500
I picked up the last two of the auction website for a little over $100 each. Plenty cost effective compared to the much smaller diameter ones available. Mike, k5wmg Pipe Creek, Texas Green cars, slow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00369.html (25,335 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:28:44 -0400
I figured it like this... If I purchased all parts separately, I have no one to blame but myself if it does not work, especially I assembled tubing from multiple sources, I cannot blame any one sourc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00404.html (10,873 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:47:47 -0400
Oh dear... I don't think that is a good plan. After erecting my 43 footer, I do not think it would be a good 43 foot mast to hold a dipole. Maybe only ten or 15 feet of it would do that safely. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00405.html (9,864 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:42:12 -0700
A data point. I had an inverted vee at 60 feet, using irrigation tubing. The bottom 30 ft was 3 inch O.D., and the top 30 ft was 2 inch O.D. Wall thickness was 0.050 inch. This is about the flimsies
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00411.html (10,095 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:55:21 -0700
All: To give you a different perspective on the amount of overlap that should be considered in slip joint connections, the industry recommended practice for tubular and multi faceted steel transmissi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00440.html (8,755 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
In my extensive experience with irrigation tubing, I have found this to be quite adequate. Plenty good enough that if you stress the joint, the tubing will buckle instead of slipping out. In terms of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00444.html (7,683 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Ray Benny" <rbenny@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:28:20 -0700
My experience with irrigation pipe: I've had a two similarly constructed phased 67ft phased verticals for 80m up for 20 years. Mine are 30 ft of 4 in at the base, next, about 28ft of 3 in, (two foot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00452.html (11,624 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:57:45 -0400
What I worry about in that case is oscillation under the right wind conditions. I think Davis, The RFConnection, and I know there's a third one selling what they call "Poly", double braid. I don't kn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00456.html (13,361 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:50:00 -0700
After much experimenting, I have learned something about the oscillation problem: 1. The worst design is a uniform diameter vertical guyed at equal intervals. This is somewhat obvious from physics.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00466.html (9,785 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:59:54 -0700
Particularly with aluminum..(DeHavilland Comets and all that) What about wrapping a rope in a spiral around the outside of the element to kill the aeolian vibration (like they use on car antennas the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00512.html (10,555 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:24:55 +0000
What I did was to run a small (1/4" dia) Poly rope the length of the vertical. Epoxied it at the top, pulled on it to apply tension and epoxied the rope to the bottom. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00514.html (11,506 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:21:36 -0400
Does the antenna have a roof window? <:-)) Seriously has about a shot of the soft foam in a can every few feet inside the tubing. I'm talking about the soft white stuff, not the yellow foam that expa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00522.html (10,259 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu