Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Dayton\s+2004\s+Antenna\s+Forum\s+Papers\s+now\s+on\s+the\s+Web\!\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:02:03 -0500
If you missed the Antenna forum at Dayton this year, or you were there and would like a copy of the presentations, you can go to http://www.k3lr.com and click on the 2004 Dayton Antenna Forum button
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00397.html (8,084 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:02:35 -0700
At 02:02 PM 5/21/2004 -0500, you wrote: If you missed the Antenna forum at Dayton this year, or you were there and would like a copy of the presentations, you can go to http://www.k3lr.com and click
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00400.html (9,569 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:58:38 -0400
Some very interesting food for thought there, particularly the plots (figure 15, page 13) showing the change in gain for adding radial length. Fractions of a dB (as in <0.1dB) for going from 0.1 to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00402.html (9,475 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:00:26 -0700
One of the least accurate uses of any Gerry Burke (of NEC fame) told me that some people had tried to measure ground characteristics by running transmission lines at low heights above the ground. I d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00432.html (9,551 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:02:17 -0700
George Hagn started with measuring the feedpoint impedance of a dipole suspended above the ground, and then trying to invert that to ground (and foliage) effects. He said he eventually went to the Op
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00438.html (11,070 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:44:16 -0700
Yes, Gerry said the measurements were done with the "Owl Kit" Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00439.html (8,422 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 05:45:30 -0400
looking at the Apparently, the problem layers" is relatively the "run of the mill not. (Having tried agree... ). Small big effect. I've made similar measurements here, but with ladder line inside a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00440.html (9,812 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Dayton 2004 Antenna Forum Papers now on the Web! (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 07:17:03 -0700
The OWL kit is basically two copper plated rods and some jigs that allow you to insert them into the soil at a precise distance apart. You use a standard impedance bridge to measure the impedance, an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00442.html (10,062 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu