Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Decision\:\s+T8\s+or\s+T11\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Decision\:\s+T8\s+or\s+T11\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Decision: T8 or T11? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Adams, PE" <msadams@buffalo.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:31:40 -0500; Hi Gang, My TX-455 is up and only supporting a dipole. Plan was to go with a new multiband beam, a Tennadyne T8 or T11. I have a Hy-Gain 64 DX along with an FO-12 from previous QTH. The Hy-Gain was u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00572.html (7,117 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Decision: T8 or T11? (score: 1): Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:10:16 -0600; Mark: Have you e-mailed Roger at Tennadyne tennadyne@tennadyne.com. He or Chuck KA1PM (the former owner) <chazzo@ktc.com> can give you some really good advice. I've talked to several hams who have th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00575.html (9,998 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Decision: T8 or T11? (score: 1): Author: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:27:01 -0600; I also used a T-10 for years at 72' and it was an outstanding performer. When I moved to a new qth with a much less capable tower, I dropped to a T-6 and have been surprised how well it works. I'm a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00576.html (11,584 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Decision: T8 or T11? (score: 1): Author: Kent Tiburski <k6fq@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:16:59 -0800 (PST); Mark and All, The question I'd ask is what your preferences are for the 6 meter side. I have a T-11 here and my decision was to replace a M2 6M7JHV and triband yagi with one antenna. The T-11 gain is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00578.html (8,653 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]