Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Decoding\s+BCD\s+with\s+passive\s+circuit\s+\(more\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:07:41 -0500
Yes, but there was a reason I specified passive decoding -- I don't want to have to power an IC or individual gates at the tower, nor do I want to have to protect them against static electricity/ligh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00539.html (8,851 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 05:26:27 -0500
The sensitivity of an IC to it's environment, depends on SYSTEM design and not on the IC itself. Otherwise we would not have Satellites, Deep Space Probes or a Space Shuttle today. You need to revise
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00540.html (10,680 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 23 Dec 2001 19:47:33 -0800
This is a mistatement. Sure there are "system level" techniques to render a probe or other complex device capable of operating after some cosmic radiation damage, but there are definitely technologie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00545.html (10,008 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:13:38 -0500
I do not think that it was a misstatement. When you deploy something in a CRITICAL environment you need to think at the System level. This will dictate the cost/performance/reliability trade offs. We
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00546.html (13,009 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 23 Dec 2001 20:20:49 -0800
This is obvious. Your statement: "The sensitivity of an IC to it's environment, depends on SYSTEM design and not on the IC itself" is incorrect. Both "system" and "IC" desing need to be taken into ac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00547.html (9,445 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:30:51 -0500
Oh... my ... I do not know where I turned wrong ... Or the world twisted ... I just responded to a question, remember? Can one do it on a passive level? And I answered NO. and I given the reasons. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00548.html (11,359 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: w5kp@swbell.net (Jerry Kincade)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 07:51:37 -0800
Would you gentlemen please advise how long will this junior high level peeing contest will go on, so I know when to start reading this reflector again? 73, Jerry W5KP ... level? pages tables, AN Wire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00556.html (13,217 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: k4bet@bellsouth.net (Paul McInnish - K4BET)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:05:27 -0800
Crap... it is even below Jr. High level... down to Kindergarten! And me sending this comment is just about as bad! No more out of me! I have entered those that are involved in this silly exchange int
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00557.html (14,445 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more) (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 06:42:02 -0800
I suggest we create another reflector for these sorts of off-topic exchanges. We can call it TESTOSTERONE-TALK.COM Anyway, glad to see everyone in the spirit of the holidays :):) Merry Christmas and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00558.html (14,921 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu