Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Deed\s+_protection_\s+for\s+antennas\s+using\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Scott W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:28:15 -0400
I developed a subdivision with some novel covenants that actually _protect_ amateur radio antennas. It also has covenants to protect farming and presence of pet horses. I can provide the wording to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00382.html (10,686 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:51:54 -0600
Heck, if someone really wanted a site up there, I have a 400 foot commercial tower, right on the ny pa line, overlooking Peakin Point ski area. 5 acres to build on! __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00383.html (11,443 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:51:49 -0400
Buy an OMNI 7, install DSL and offer the site as an HF Internet Remote for all those hams that are restricted from building their own antenna farms. Create an Internet Remote Club to fund an antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00391.html (10,994 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:00:50 -0000
Hi Folks! In my experience, this issue of antennas and towers decreasing property values is just noise and not supported by the facts. It seems to be more of a way for someone to impose their narrow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00966.html (8,643 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@npgcable.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:23:48 -0700
Ciao OT Gordon, 73, Hank, W6SX Mammoth Lakes, California _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00969.html (9,060 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:59:31 -0000
Hank, Adjacent blocks with similar homes and no towers went up in the same manner. 73, Gordon, W2TTT Ciao OT Gordon, 73, Hank, W6SX Mammoth Lakes, California _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00971.html (8,186 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:24:28 -0400
But the sellers could still claim -- but cannot prove -- that their homes would have sold at a higher price if it were not for your tower. There is no way of *proving* either assertion because it is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00977.html (8,763 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:36:32 -0700
Where does it end??? My neighbors house next door is for sale. Should I take my tower and antennas down so they could possiblty get more for it. Could my neighbors get more for their house if I mayb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00978.html (9,398 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:24:38 -0700
Ciao OT Gordon, 73, Hank, W6SX Mammoth Lakes, California _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00982.html (9,550 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:31:28 -0500
It's a slow day here so I just can't resist... :-) NEIGHBOR "Man those unsightly towers and antennas certainly depress our property values around here." HAM "Oh, I didn't realize that was an issue. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00983.html (9,960 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:43:06 -0400
But that's why "we" have Homeowners' Associations -- to prohibit such nefarious activities as changing my car's wiper blades while it is standing in the driveway, allowing the kids to use sidewalk ch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00990.html (10,183 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Krishna Kanakasapapathi <kkanakas@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:30:07 -0400
Folks, The antenna zoning book by K1VR has a lot of documentation as well as a study on this topic about property values. Apart from the above, based on postings from this list, i was able to compile
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00018.html (12,329 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:22:14 -0700
You may want to try to research previous permit requests that have been previously challenged in your area. I don't mean just for towers ... I mean for anything that may have had objections from neig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00020.html (15,040 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Tom Anderson <WW5L@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:22:10 -0500
While I'm not a land appraiser, I just know how they appraised my current QTH. They took a list of "comparable" homes both in my neighborhood and outside it and somehow came up with a value. To my kn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00023.html (9,938 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 16:42:27 -0400
TT: -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Anderson" <WW5L@gte.net> To: "Alan NV8A" <nv8a@att.net> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>; "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; "'Hank Garretson'" <w6sx
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00026.html (8,812 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Scott W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:27:52 -0400
This is why the future of amateur radio will depend, to some degree, upon remote stations. We need to collectively get over the idea that our antennas need to be co-located with our home! 73, Scott W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00034.html (8,481 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu