Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Dielectric\s+Flood\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Dielectric\s+Flood\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Dielectric Flood (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Okamitsu <jokamitsu@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:21:36 -0700 (PDT); What's the word on using a dielectric flooding compound with RF connectors? Does it help? (or does it hurt) Is it worth the effort? How long does it last? Any adverse long-term effects? 73. Jeff W3KL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00837.html (6,901 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Dielectric Flood (score: 1): Author: Paul Kelley N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:37:16 -0400; I didn't see any responses on list but you probably got your answer. I think the consensus in the past was it is not recommended. I went through a phase some years ago where I would fill UHF connecto; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00013.html (7,998 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Dielectric Flood (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:10:17 EDT; connectors with Dow Corning #4. I never had a problem with one and it did keep water out. Some were up for as much as 5 years before being replaced due to upgrades. However, YMMV! I think it is not a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00049.html (7,855 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Dielectric Flood (score: 1): Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 01:38:45 -0400; It is and is what DC 4 was originally designed for. It certainly is messy and I used to believe in "proper waterproofing" of connectors until mother nature proved to me there is no such thing or at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00052.html (10,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]