Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Dielectric\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Dielectric\s+losses\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 01:23:51 -0800; Hi All, I found the following blurb on the Times Microwave Systems website: C. ATTENUATION .......Attenuation is determined by the conductive and dielectric losses of the cable. Larger cables have lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00016.html (23,535 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:50:24 EST; The best definition yet, thanks Mike! One other thing that comes to mind, in older cables there were problems with migration, where properties of the insulation between the center conductor and shiel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00021.html (8,542 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:59:50 -0500; Dielectric losses in typical coaxial cables do not contribute significantly to loss at HF. The primary loss mechanism is conductor loss. The reason various dielectrics might *seem* to produce differ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00638.html (8,444 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:46:00 -0800; An article in QST about 10-15 years ago discussed loss in coax. It was written by an engineer for one of the major cable companies (possibly Amphenol?). It said that,in the HF range, the dominant los; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00639.html (10,159 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:48:01 EST; You asked for it, here it is: To refresh the memory, here is the original W8JI statement: using a foam dielectric. The vast majority of loss is conductor resistance related, and has nothing to do wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00664.html (13,357 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:27:31 -0500; Of course it does. No one said it doesn't. The reason the power rating changes is some dielectrics have lower voltage ratings, and some allow the use of a larger center conductor for a given power.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00666.html (13,673 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:21:16 EST; One more try to educate the "guru": W8JI is "no one" who said: ""The vast majority of loss is conductor resistance related, and has nothing to do with what dielectric is used in a coaxial cable excep; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00672.html (19,948 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]