Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Distributed\s+tower\s+loads\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Gary Johnson <gwj@spamcop.net>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 19:15:53 -0700
Hello TT experts. I'm looking for guidance on how you estimate wind load capacity of a tower when multiple antennas are distributed at various elevations, in addition to top-mast mounting. Short of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00020.html (7,319 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: KD0Q-Glenn <kd0q@traer.net>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 07:56:45 -0500
Here's an old QEX article that might help - http://www.arrl.org/files/file/protected/Group/Members/Technology/tis/info/pdf/1123.pdf, there's a spreadsheet at http://www.arrl.org/files/file/QEX%20Bina
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00022.html (8,702 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Joe Orsak <jorsak@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 09:00:15 -0400
You can strike North Carolina off the rural list, the carpetbaggers have paved over everything here:-) 73, Joe W4WN _______________________________________________ ___________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00023.html (8,611 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 13:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
And you want to strike WA off the list because it rains everywhere here, every day. WA is also the worst in [insert name of subject]. It's awful here. That's what we want those considering moving her
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00024.html (7,652 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Gary Johnson <gwj@spamcop.net>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 18:56:05 -0700
One bit of clarification... I neglected to say that I am interested in GUYED towers, not free-standing, so the ordinary bending moment calculations are not so applicable. If we assume ideal inelastic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00025.html (7,771 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Scott <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:43:20 -0400
Distributed tower loads are complex in nature. A full analysis requires information about the foundation soil, the foundation, the tower, antennas, your QTH's specific TIA-G parameters, the Internati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00026.html (9,205 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Joe Orsak <jorsak@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 23:20:13 -0400
Actually as long as you are a ham we'd be happy to have you as a neighbor here in NC. In fact my wife KG4ENN is a real estate agent, I've been teaching her how to run HFTA so she might even be able t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00027.html (9,018 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 09:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
My post was tongue-in-cheek. I sometimes think about taking a vacation somewhere else but then realize I already live in the best place on earth. I just want to keep it that way. ;-) vy 73, Bryan WA7
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00029.html (9,707 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Distributed tower loads (score: 1)
Author: Gary Johnson <gwj@spamcop.net>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 13:21:34 -0700
I did find one very useful reference on guyed towers with distributed loads (among other things), from K7NV: <http://k7nv.com/notebook/towerstudy/towerstudy1.html> This is the level of "resolution" I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00039.html (8,998 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu