Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Do\s+Log\-Periodics\s+Stress\s+the\s+Selectivity\s+of\s+the\s+Receiver\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Do Log-Periodics Stress the Selectivity of the Receiver? (score: 1)
Author: DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net (DavidC)
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:44:31 -0500
As I compare log periodics to yagis and quads that there is an open question ... perhaps only in my feeble mind ... ;-) A band-specific yagi, be it monoband or multiband, receives many signals but ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00509.html (8,306 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Do Log-Periodics Stress the Selectivity of the Receiver? (score: 1)
Author: Don Moman <ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> (Don Moman)
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 01:14:19 -0700 (MST)
and from a log periodic manufacturer: the on say wouldn't not ham as will off towards As a long time LP owner/user and being an active SWL, the log captures way more signal off the front, side or any
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00521.html (10,834 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Do Log-Periodics Stress the Selectivity of the Receiver? (score: 1)
Author: DavidC" <eDoc@netzero.net (DavidC)
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 10:17:39 -0500
Don, Thanks for your comments! I'm afraid I didn't clarify all of the parameters of my question to the log periodic manufacturer. My comparison was only to the Force 12 trapless design, not beams who
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00524.html (12,391 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu