Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Downhill\s+anchors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Downhill\s+anchors\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swiderski, KU4BP" <ku4bp@triad.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:00:17 -0500; After seeing my planned tower location become literally washed away. A flat area but considered a flood plane. (Got VERY flooded after weekend rain, almost a pond) I'm looking at putting my planned t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00718.html (7,753 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:59:59 -0500; Ed: Besides extending the length of the downhill guy, you might consider using an elevated guy anchor. This is a steel I-beam of appropriate dimensions embedded in enough concrete to resist overturni; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00724.html (10,232 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:05:18 -0500; Ed, Keeping the angle the same is a problem when you have more than one level of guys: either you go to multiple guy points or you have a different angle for one (or 2) sets of guys. -Rex Rex Lint, C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00725.html (9,251 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:08:27 -0500; I used 10ft "I" beams years ago for elevated anchors. Using the 60/40 rule, with 6ft in the ground and in concrete and 4ft out of the ground. The corner was cut off and holes drilled into the beam wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00726.html (12,090 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Dave - AB7E" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:33:38 -0700; The angle for the lower set of guys would be the most relevant and I'd be surprised if the upper set(s) of guys couldn't live with that, but if it was really an issue he could probably put the equali; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00730.html (10,602 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:51:12 -0500; Basically try to keep the guy angles the same which can either be measured or calculated. Position and measure it probably going to be the easiest unless you have a transit. Were it me, and it's not,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00731.html (9,872 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:43:27 -0500; There is a lot of leverage on elevated anchors and I would avoid using them unless really necessary. You could move the downhill anchor further away from the tower base to maintain the guy angle. I h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00734.html (10,790 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: <john@iguanavilla.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:43:06 -0500; There is a lot of leverage on elevated anchors and I would avoid using them unless really necessary. You could move the downhill anchor further away from the tower base to maintain the guy angle. I h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00744.html (11,034 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Williams, Richard (OAG/CPG)" <Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:03:15 -0400; Hire an engineer. Rick VE9HF --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of john@iguanavilla.com Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00747.html (12,016 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <kk9a@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:06:42 -0800 (PST); sorry, bad typing I guess http://www.qrz.com/db/p40a To: towertalk@contesting.com Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Downhill anchors From: hanslg@aol.com Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics."; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00762.html (9,661 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Downhill anchors (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swiderski, KU4BP" <ku4bp@triad.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:16:50 -0500; Thanks for all the help. I think the elevated anchor approach would not be feasible for me. Moving the point out while maintaining the required angle would work for. The whole installation is a work; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00808.html (12,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]