Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Drake\s+MN\-2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Drake\s+MN\-2000\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Drake MN-2000 (score: 1): Author: glsalvia@capri.it (Gian Luca Salvia); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 12:56:26 +0100; Hi all, I was wondering if is available a mod for the MN-2000 tuner, to add 160 meters on. Thanks and 73's -- Luca IC8WIC glsalvia@capri.it ic8wic@qsl.net -- http://www.geocities.com/Paris/5846 http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00297.html (7,224 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Drake MN-2000 (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 07:29:40 -0500 (EST); In general, it is usually not good practice to simply modify an 80-10 meter coupler for 160 meter operation (unless one wishes to replace everything inside and make a true 160 meter tuner). Although; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00298.html (8,780 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Drake MN-2000 (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 16:29:05 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi All, The single largest problem with T network tuner power handling and efficiency on 160 and 80 is most tuners have FAR too much Q. In other words they lack enough; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00321.html (8,931 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]