- 1. [TowerTalk] Driving Remote Relays--simply (score: 1)
- Author: "k6xx@juno.com" <k6xx@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:47:50 GMT
- Remote Ant. Switch Operators: Here is perhaps a simpler (and certainly more efficient) solution for sticky relays. Given that relays need a higher 'activate' current than 'hold' current, what we'd re
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00236.html (8,244 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving Remote Relays--simply (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:25:46 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- Remote Ant. Switch Operators: Here is perhaps a simpler (and certainly more efficient) solution for sticky relays. Given that relays need a higher 'activate' current than 'hold' current, what we'd re
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00249.html (9,211 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving Remote Relays--simply (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:00:12 -0500
- constant current source (set for the "hold current") and a fairly large capacitor across the output. When the realy is open, the capacitor charges up to the max supply voltage through the regulator.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00250.html (11,097 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu