Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+EF\-240S\s+woes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+EF\-240S\s+woes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] EF-240S woes (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:20:36 -0400; I'd like to share a cautionary tale, and ask for advice. About 7 years ago, I got a Force 12 EF-240S and put it up at the top of my tower, at 104 feet. As most probably know, this antenna uses two id; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00539.html (9,688 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] EF-240S woes (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:39:42 -0500; Sure looks like the reflector is really resonating above 6940 once the antenna is in place. I would set the driven element to 7060 first with the reflector open, then lengthen the reflector until min; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00541.html (10,840 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] EF-240S woes (score: 1): Author: "Bill" <w5vx@hiline.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:46:15 -0500; Pete, About the same time you bought yours, I bought an EF240S too. I tried to get the thing tuned. Even rented a 120 foot crane twice and tried to tune it in place. After phone calls and three effor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00544.html (11,687 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] EF-240S woes (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:59:34 -0400; frequency, and tram This is enough to isn't so prone to too important to I rented a sign truck with a 130 ft boom and an extension to tune my antenna. It's a modified Telrex antenna (fixed so it doe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00545.html (8,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]