Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Effective\s+moment\s+and\s+K\-factor\.\s+Was\:\s+Yaesu\s+rotators\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Effective\s+moment\s+and\s+K\-factor\.\s+Was\:\s+Yaesu\s+rotators\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:19:29 -0400; Is Yaesu's "K-factor" the same as Hy-Gain's "Effective moment"? If not, Alan AB2OS I wrote: In the course of looking around for a good price for a G-1000DXA, I went to the Texas Towers Web site and n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00000.html (7,553 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:10:56 -0400; Yes - they are both weight times turning radius. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00004.html (7,752 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:38:33 -0400; Somebody suggested in a private message (not to the reflector) that they are different: "effective moment" takes into account the distance from the axis of each component of the total load, whereas Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00011.html (8,659 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:34:09 EDT; What makes sense here is to use Yasu's method of K factor with Yaesu rotors and use the Hygain method with Hygain rotors. We don't have enough knowledge of the manufacturer's safety margins to guess; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00014.html (8,114 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:45:36 EDT; Nope. They're both weight times turning radius. I think I already mentioned that. Regardless, both are approximations of rotator capacity and much better than just square footage. Cheers, Steve K7LXC; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00015.html (8,285 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:52:20 EDT; knowledge conservative. The bottom line is that they're the SAME and they're just APPROXIMATIONS based on the manufacturer's knowledge of the unit. This is an improvement over the old square footage; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00016.html (8,661 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 03:53:56 -0400; At 02:52 PM 7/1/2004, K7LXC@aol.com wrote: The bottom line is that they're the SAME and they're just APPROXIMATIONS based on the manufacturer's knowledge of the unit. This is an improvement over the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00023.html (10,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]