Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Electrical\s+conductivity\s+of\s+crankups\s+for\s+shunt\s+feeding\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Electrical\s+conductivity\s+of\s+crankups\s+for\s+shunt\s+feeding\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Electrical conductivity of crankups for shunt feeding (score: 1): Author: G3XRJ@btinternet.com (John - G3XRJ -); Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 09:22:11 +0100; Having successfully used a shunt fed fixed mast for many years, I am contemplating a crankup. What is the best method of ensuring good electrical continuity of the adjoining sections. Thanks John - G; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00088.html (7,400 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Electrical conductivity of crankups for shunt feeding (score: 1): Author: k3gt@pgh.net (Bob Thacker); Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 09:10:19 -0400; Hi John. I have successfully fed a crank up at its lowest position for many years. I chose to resonate it at its lowest position so I could operate when the winds start howling at -20 F. None of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00089.html (10,377 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Electrical conductivity of crankups for shunt feeding (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements); Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:47:53 -0500; I think this was an "old wive's tale" started years ago by the owner of a cheap, flimsy, crank-up! I have owned and shunt-fed a Tri-Ex LM-470D for years. I have worked the world on 160 with it and ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00098.html (8,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]