Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elevated\s+guys\s+to\s+a\s+extreme\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elevated\s+guys\s+to\s+a\s+extreme\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: "Terry Gerdes" <terry@ab5k.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:49:01 -0600; This installation demonstrates using a existing tower as one of the guy anchors and guying part way up the existing tower. Not a good idea. Details at: http://home.swbell.net/swca/radio/towerday.html; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00617.html (6,734 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: "Jason Creager" <jason@creager.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:15:59 -0800; Please do not think that I am trying to be a "know-it-all" about tower installations, but my employers have spent thousands upon thousands of dollars to train me to recognize dangerous situations inv; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00620.html (11,846 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:32:06 -0500; This page was dated September 2001 -- is the guy-anchor tower still in use, was it replaced or did it fail? 73/Jon AA1K _______________________________________________ _______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00621.html (7,164 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:57:28 -0800; Could be an ok idea, though.. All a matter of design and analysis. Certainly not "simple" or "cookbook", and as N5OT points out, a pain to adjust. However, elevated guys might solve a problem. The id; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00644.html (8,795 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:07:40 -0800; Oddly, this isn't inherently a bad idea (unlike some of the assembly practices you talk about below, which are). Anything can be adequately engineered, and that includes all manner of odd configurati; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00645.html (22,789 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:32:52 -0800; I don't understand all the fuss about using man rated climbing ropes and such for tower climbing. How many people climb towers where they are counting on a long slack ropes for fall arrest? I use pai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00649.html (13,223 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:41:36 EST; Hiya, Jim -- Tnx for your thoughtful comments in reply to KC0ERG's email enumerating the potential problems with N5OT's tower installation. The thing is that while OSHA rules are promulgated to promo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00652.html (8,564 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to a extreme (score: 1): Author: "Jason Creager" <jason@creager.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:35:17 -0800; Guys, here's the deal: I CLEARLY stated that OSHA's regulations do not specifically apply in this situation. However, just because OSHA does not apply in this situation, it DOESN'T RELEASE YOU FROM C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00655.html (9,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]