Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+End\s+Fed\s+Half\s+Wave\s+Noise\s+Remedy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+End\s+Fed\s+Half\s+Wave\s+Noise\s+Remedy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] End Fed Half Wave Noise Remedy (score: 1): Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:31:51 -0400; All: I use an end-fed half wave for portable work and was wondering what the most effective way would be to reduce the ingress of feed-line noise? I've compared it to a resonant center fed dipole in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00159.html (7,309 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] End Fed Half Wave Noise Remedy (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 14:27:36 -0700; I'm no expert at all on such matters, but it seems to me that chokes should be placed wherever the current maximums of the undesired signal would be. Chokes don't do any good at current minimums. T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00160.html (9,219 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] End Fed Half Wave Noise Remedy (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:51:24 -0700; There are MANY ways of end-feeding a dipole. Mine is shown in this set of slides for a talk about the mounting height of vertical antennas. It's a long talk with a lot of slides. Skip ahead to slide; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00161.html (9,351 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] End Fed Half Wave Noise Remedy (score: 1): Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:54:46 -0400; All: Adding stack of mix 31 cores at the feed point of my end-fed half-wave portable antenna eliminated the noise I was picking up on the feed line. The single-core did help, but the stack does a muc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00189.html (7,976 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]