Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+F12\s+240N\s+Magnum\s+and\s+Cushcraft\s+A3WS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+F12\s+240N\s+Magnum\s+and\s+Cushcraft\s+A3WS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] F12 240N Magnum and Cushcraft A3WS (score: 1): Author: Tom_N2SR <tom_n2sr@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 06:34:26 -0700 (PDT); I have a F12 240N Magnum up at 100 feet. Currently I have a TH7 at 90 feet below it. A summer plan is to take the TH7 down, put a C31XR at 80 feet on a ring rotator (at the top set of guys), and te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00224.html (7,382 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] F12 240N Magnum and Cushcraft A3WS (score: 1): Author: Tony Brock-Fisher <barockteer@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:08:52 -0400; I would put the C31XR on the top of the pile and put the 240 under it. The reason is that the extra height will help 3 bands by about 1db at low takeoff angles, and moving the 40 down will not hurt t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00226.html (7,694 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] F12 240N Magnum and Cushcraft A3WS (score: 1): Author: Edward <navydude1962@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:29:33 -0700; Won't 10m suffer at that height? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00227.html (8,001 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]