Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FT1000MP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FT1000MP\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:50:37 +0000 (UTC); Would like to get in touch with anyone who did own or does own a FT1000MP and has used the separate receive antenna jack for a receive only antenna while using the A or B antenna jacks for the transm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00258.html (7,105 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:58:54 -0600; I have used a FT-1000 MP MK V with separate receive antennas (beverages) on the receive only jack for about six years with no problems. 73... Bill ND9E Would like to get in touch with anyone who did; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00259.html (8,898 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:04:53 -0500; John, I think you'll fnd that most people using the receive jack are using some type of outboard receive antenna switch to take the receiver out of harms way. I have damaged the receive section by no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00260.html (9,175 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:07:31 -0800; Same experience here. My Beverages are rather widely separated (about 200 ft) from my TX antennas and have robust chokes at both ends of their coax to decouple them from their feedlines. I ran that w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00261.html (8,223 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:18:01 -0600; Bill, I'd appreciate some info on the outboard switch you use since I've never used one and may want to. Do you switch in on or off every time you transmit? Or is it controlled by your key line? Than; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00262.html (10,021 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Bob Moore" <ki6iv@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:20:07 -0800; I have a MP, I have a receive ant hooked up, the K9AY Loop System, on transit the MP blanks the receive ant input. I have never had any problem, all works well. It is very convenient to be able to sw; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00263.html (9,019 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] FT1000mp (score: 1): Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@radiusnorth.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:03:34 -0500; For a "plug and play" solution, KD9SV designed the following device to protect rx ports on radios: http://www.radio-ware.com/products/fes.htm Craig Clark K1QX Radioware PO Box 209 Rindge NH 03461 603; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00266.html (8,463 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: k7lxc@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:07:48 EST; FT1000MP and has used the separate receive antenna jack for a receive only antenna while using the A or B antenna jacks for the transmit antenna. Then why didn't you post this on the Yaesu or FT1000; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00267.html (8,540 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000mp (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:19:48 -0600; And for those with newer radios, if you combine a product such as KD9SV's with the ability to delay the onset of TX following key closure, you'd never have to worry about blowing a front end again...; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00269.html (9,588 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:46:38 -0800 (PST); John I have my main antenna - dipole- at 130ft and below is the RX antenna , using the MFJ -1026- to protect my front end there is a small fuse , that is only a 50ma 12v bulb, before the ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00270.html (9,903 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Rod Ehrhart" <dxengineering@dxengineering.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:48:33 -0500; The actual thread of this post should be: Receive Antenna Input Switching and Protection John, the device you are looking for is known as a Receive Antenna Interface for Transceivers, available from; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00271.html (10,177 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:48:38 -0600; No problem here with the receiving loop about 30 feet from the Inverted L. To be safe though, I purchased the KD9SV Dxpedition Model Dual Pre-Amp with the Front End Protector. It's a very nice unit.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00272.html (8,312 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: jcowens1@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:09:49 +0000 (UTC); My thanks to the many folks who responded to my request for info on the FT1000MP receive antenna jack isolation. My appology also to those who felt this was off-topic for this reflector. Even though; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00282.html (8,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]