Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+135\s+degrees\s+phasing\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+135\s+degrees\s+phasing\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Jose M. Valdes R. YV5LIX" <yv5lix@yv5lix.org.ve>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:50:53 -0000; Hello, I'm getting ready for the next CQWW SSB contest and I'm working in phasing 2 1/4 wave verticals for 75 meters and all simulations shows that best gain is obtained with 135 degrees phasing, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00682.html (8,183 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:06:23 -0400; Joe, Why wouldn't you just add half of a 1/4 wave to a 1/4 wave? 90 degrees plus 43 degrees - 135 degrees. Rex - K1HI Merrimack --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00687.html (8,940 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:27:57 -0400; Exactly Rex. It gets interesting if he's cutting the cables for electrical length instead of by physical length. If he's doing electrical length by looking for a point where they're (n+1)/4 wavelengt; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00690.html (11,072 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:50:53 -0400; Oops! That should have read 90 degrees plus 45 degrees = 135 degrees. We're talking electrical length here, not physical length - but you already took care of that issue by using the velocity factor.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00691.html (10,310 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <W4TV@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:49:55 -0400; Don't forget, the phase change in a cable is not equal to the electrical length of that cable if the SWR is not unity. You will need to calculate the necessary electrical length of the cable carefull; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00725.html (11,737 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Jose M. Valdes R. YV5LIX" <yv5lix@cantv.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:46:26 -0000; Hello Jerry, Yes, I'm using electrical length for my calculations. 73 Jose, YV5LIX. Exactly Rex. It gets interesting if he's cutting the cables for electrical length instead of by physical length. If; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00726.html (12,102 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: 135 degrees phasing. (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:42:14 -0400; know how to obtain 90 degrees is easy lines, which can but 135 is not as and one 1/4 wave but 135 degrees The delay of a transmission line is equal to the electrical length **only** when: 1.) The li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00746.html (9,725 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]