Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+If\s+you\s+had\s+a\s+choice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+If\s+you\s+had\s+a\s+choice\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: Michael Zeglen <kl7ai@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:05:14 -0700; If you had a choice between antennas which would you choose a Mosley Pro 57B 3 inch boom or Cubev 4 element 5 band quad. Both would be mounted at 50ft. I do not have modeling software to compair. Tho; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00239.html (7,486 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:16:55 -0400; Based on the K7LXC/N0AX tribander tests, I'd take *anything* over a Mosley antenna - even a rotary dipole. 73, ... Joe, W4TV If you had a choice between antennas which would you choose a Mosley Pro 5; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00240.html (7,708 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: <chetmoore@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:59:39 -0400; I'm pretty sure the mosely was reviewed in the K7LXC tribander report, I don't remember if the cubex was included. You should beg borrow steal or buy this report. My quad worked well in California an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00241.html (8,798 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:20:02 -0700; I would suggest "none of the above". I've used a 2-element quad and it played well, but I found it difficult to adjust and maintain. I've met a few people that really like multi-element quads, and th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00242.html (9,630 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:32:42 -0400 (EDT); I've had quads up to 7 elements and big Yagis. For ease of set up and plug and play, Yagis are the way to go. More often than not, medium sized Yagis are a lot easier to keep up and working. Me, I'm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00243.html (7,112 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1): Author: Jon Pearl - W4ABC <jonpearl@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:53:50 -0400; While Cubical Quads are great performers, they're three-dimensional and require more care and feeding than that of the typical Yagi. Also - because they are so tall, stacking of VHF and UHF antennas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00256.html (10,158 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]