Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Failures\s+due\s+to\s+preventative\s+maintenance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Failures\s+due\s+to\s+preventative\s+maintenance\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Failures due to preventative maintenance? (score: 1): Author: alsopb@vance.net (alsopb@vance.net); Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 15:02:54 -0500; Guys, The "pulley replacement" issue lead me to the following general questions: Can imprudent (imprudent = different from manufacturer recommendations or ?) or frequent periodic maintenance actully; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00013.html (8,809 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Failures due to preventative maintenance? (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 20:01:02 -0500; There's certainly a possibility that more frequent maintenance can increase the probability of failure, but, like many observations based on statistics, the numbers can be misleading. For example, so; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00022.html (11,784 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]