- 1. [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: WarrenWolff@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:26:55 EDT
- Fellow TTalkers, For those who are inclined, may I suggest a short letter to the City Planner at Grand Terrace CA - - and/or a letter to the Voice of the People in The San Bernardino County Sun. One
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00338.html (7,351 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: "bob" <wf3h@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:12:29 -0400
- I had to whip my local township into shape over this issue about 2 years ago. I reminded the township attorney that aesthetics were specifically forbidden to be used in deciding on providing a zoning
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00345.html (9,713 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:14:21 -0500
- Another thing: just claiming that property values will decline because of "ugly" does not prove the case. When one goes to court (which we all wish to avoid) the legal teams on both sides will have "
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00369.html (11,988 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:04:06 -0700
- Probably better to post this sort of thing over on hamlaw, but.. number one thing to do: Get Fred Hopengarten's book on antennas, zoning, etc. from the ARRL. www.antennazoning.com number two thing to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00370.html (15,708 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: ersmar@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:35:05 +0000
- TT: A year after I erected my tower on the property I received an assessment letter from the county fathers. My property value, and hence taxes, had increased. This, in spite of (or because of?) the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00372.html (8,986 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:21:04 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- NO! Thank you for posting this here! It IS about antennas, it is fantastic information, and I would have missed it as I'm not subscribed to hamlaw! Also, a BIG THANK YOU for posting this back to the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00373.html (8,510 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:46:30 -0700
- It would be useful if someone could track down Fred's (K1VR) powerpoint presentation from Dayton (I know it's out there, but I couldn't find it w/google). It's a useful short summary of PRB-1 and als
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00374.html (9,261 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: "Reicher, James" <JReicher@hrblock.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:14:38 -0500
- Amen to that. I live in an area where all the utilities are underground, not far from K0DAN. No telephone poles at all. I put up my tower a couple years ago... 48' of Rohn 25G with a TH5, 4 elements
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00377.html (12,803 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:36:44 -0700
- In my area, 80% of the houses sell for more than the asking price, so that might not be saying much. Of course, YMMV. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomp
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00378.html (8,933 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
- Author: "Reicher, James" <JReicher@hrblock.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:41:17 -0500
- That's not the norm in the Blackhole of the Midwest. Here, the asking price is what it sells for, or very close to it. 73 de N8AU, Jim in Raymore, MO In my area, 80% of the houses sell for more than
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00379.html (9,347 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu