Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ferrites\s+31\s+vs\.\s+77\s+material\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:37:24 -0400
Back ~ 2000, I was using 77 material vs. 43 material for Ferrite chokes and I constructed an impedance table by freq.to determined how many beads I should use on each band. Now we talk about and use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00217.html (6,723 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 13:31:47 -0700
I'm sure K9YC, who knows at least 20 dB more on the subject that I do, will have a more thorough explanation but basically the reason is that Type 31 material has desirable loss at HF frequencies ins
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00218.html (8,211 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Svend Spanget <spanget@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:13:33 +0100
Here is an interesting article: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/chokes/ \Svend, OZ7UV _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00220.html (9,261 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 21:49:22 -0400
Thank you Dave and Svend! 73 Bob KQ2M Here is an interesting article: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/chokes/ \Svend, OZ7UV søn. 27. okt. 2019 21.32 skrev David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>: _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00249.html (10,258 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:35:05 -0700
Yes, but virtually all of the recommendations for #43 and #52 material are WRONG! The problem is not his measurements, but rather the wide tolerances of Fair-Rite components combined with the relativ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00250.html (8,661 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:39:34 -0700
On 10/27/2019 1:31 PM, David Gilbert wrote: I'm sure K9YC, who knows at least 20 dB more on the subject that I do, will have a more thorough explanation but basically the reason is that Type 31 mater
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00251.html (8,959 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Svend Spanget <spanget@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:40:00 +0100
Never the less he gets more than 8 kohm resistive impedance in a large frequency range using 52... \Svend Sendt fra min OnePlus One _______________________________________________ ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00252.html (8,957 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
"Yes, but virtually all of the recommendations for #43 and #52 material are WRONG!" Steve is sadly no longer with us and unable to defend himself. However, he had previously rigorously defended his m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00253.html (8,243 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:51:15 -0700
"Yes, but virtually all of the recommendations for #43 and #52 material are WRONG!" Steve is sadly no longer with us and unable to defend himself. However, he had previously rigorously defended his m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00254.html (9,438 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:46:45 -0700
I was once trying to design a conducted power line EMI filter that had to have a lot of attenuation at one frequency around 100 kHz, and the power level was several kW. I needed a rather huge expensi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00255.html (11,054 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:54:14 -0700
Many (many) years ago I was a component engineer at Collins Radio with responsibility for passive components, including ferrite cores.  I was told by the core vendor that fabricating them was best li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-10/msg00256.html (11,509 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 01:40:11 +0000 (UTC)
<The thing he missed, and that I also missed until recently, is the effect of component tolerances. > Sorry for the delay in responding - I was away. I was aware around 40 years ago that certain (but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00002.html (7,570 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 02:28:51 -0700
You have a vivid imagination. :) I have measured data to prove that. Also see N6RK's post. As luck would have it, I gave a talk to a Silicon Valley club tonight on a very different topic, but afterwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00003.html (8,121 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Very funny. The posts from both N6RK and AB7E support my statement that variability in ferrite parameters has been known for a very long time. You're the one who asserted that it has just been discov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00004.html (7,448 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 09:32:13 -0700
You have a vivid imagination. :) I have measured data to prove that. Also see N6RK's post. As luck would have it, I gave a talk to a Silicon Valley club tonight on a very different topic, but afterwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00005.html (9,720 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:18:23 -0700
<Very funny. <The posts from both N6RK and AB7E support my statement that variability in ferrite parameters has been known for a very long time. You're the one who asserted that it has just been disc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00006.html (8,550 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:51:26 -0700
On 11/2/19 10:18 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:25:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> To: "Tower and HF Antenna Construction Topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>, "j
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00007.html (9,858 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 11:21:42 -0700
I find that kind of China bashing pretty funny.  Ridiculous as a generalization. I worked for a large semiconductor manufacturer for over thirty years and we ended up putting a joint venture manufact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00008.html (10,622 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:48:13 -0700
Sadly, there is much evidence. Fair-rite quality really took a hit after they moved production to Asia. So much so that many companies have had to institute new QA procedures on incoming product to s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00009.html (12,540 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrites 31 vs. 77 material (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 16:14:24 -0700
Well, if that's the case it means that Fair-Rite did a poor job of transferring the manufacturing, and yes ... I've seen a bunch of other companies do the same crappy job of it especially when all th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-11/msg00010.html (13,744 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu