Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fiberglass\s+UV\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fiberglass\s+UV\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:52:20 -0600; I question if steppir has any miracle to protect the fiberglass..what I do know is after boating for over 30 years, nothing I have ever seen will protect the fiberglass antenna from UV damage,wind/sa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00464.html (29,270 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:17:53 -0500; Nonsense ... I've seen commercial fiberglass antennas last for 10+ years. If I needed to do so I could renew A SteppIR (even a four element antenna) for less than $250 (eight ESTs at $30 each). $25; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00466.html (7,927 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:39:59 -0600; Yes indeed, I would be surprised, considering that some of the very best manufacturers of antennas have yet to defeat UV and mother nature...mother always wins. Nonsense?..not so when your own commen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00467.html (9,152 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 06:52:22 -0500; At 01:39 AM 3/23/04, WD4K wrote: Nonsense?..not so when your own comments even limit the life expectancy to 10 years or so, and that is probably a stretch..time will tell. Hmmm -- if you're right, th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00482.html (8,160 bytes)
5. RE: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:54:25 -0600; Are not the polygon guys made from solid material with a formula more than glass matt, resin and topcoat over a hollow tube? Just asking. I see no common ground between these two products. 73, Tommy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00496.html (8,603 bytes)
6. RE: [TowerTalk] Fiberglass UV (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:45:04 -0500; At 06:54 PM 3/23/04, WD4K wrote: Are not the polygon guys made from solid material with a formula more than glass matt, resin and topcoat over a hollow tube? Just asking. I see no common ground betwe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00505.html (8,844 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]