Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fold\s+over\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fold\s+over\s+towers\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fold over towers (score: 1): Author: "Bert Almemo" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:33:49 -0400; I have been searching the Internet for info about Rohn (or other make) fold over towers but haven't found much. There seem to be quite a few of these fold over towers in use but who makes and sells t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00436.html (6,978 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fold over towers (score: 1): Author: "Bert Almemo" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:16:06 -0400; Thanks to all who responded with ideas and suggestions to my posting about fold over towers. It's a pitty there are no manufactures left making fold over towers like Rohn. I've looked at Heights Towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00454.html (7,240 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fold over towers (score: 1): Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:38 -0400; On 03/22/07 10:16 am Bert Almemo wrote: Thanks to all who responded with ideas and suggestions to my posting about fold over towers. It's a pitty there are no manufactures left making fold over tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00458.html (7,857 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:29:07 -0500; I'm trying to decide between a crank-up,fold over or self suporting tower.Looking at holding a Becher Skyhawk and Cushcraft XM-240 in the air at 55-75 feet.I have no problem with climbing but its har; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00803.html (8,459 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:40:06 -0500 (CDT); Greg: Based on my experience, I could recommend a Trylon Titan series of SS tower. Mine is their T-500-64. To haul up the antennas, my ground crew and I used a gin pole lashed to the top two feet of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00804.html (9,624 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:27:37 EDT; I'm not a big fan of foldovers, having lost two that folded over a lot faster than they were supposed to (crashed). You don't want to wrestle antennas through guy wires? Don't! I have used the lift i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00816.html (8,024 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:30:07 -0500; I have a 68' Rohn 25 foldover which I've had up since 1970. The first antenna was a TH6DXX which was replaced by a KT34XA in 1981 and has been up ever since. I've had no problems with the tower and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00818.html (7,946 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: N6FD <n6fd@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:08:44 -0700; I would be very interested in how to tell which 45 tilt overs had problems, as I have an old one that I acquired from a SK's estate. What was the failure mode? Is there any way to tell from the stron; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00819.html (9,351 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:15:51 EDT; If the strong back was damaged, it may be slightly bent, have a welded piece attached or there may be an extra weld joint or two where there wasn't normally one during production. Bill KH7XS/K4XS **; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00820.html (7,260 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:58:17 -0500; Greg: Take a look at Heights Towers, they have a fold-over mechanism that works very well. I have an 80 ft tower that folds from the base using a motor driven jackscrew. MY tower is rated at 35 sq ft; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00822.html (9,929 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:37:04 EDT; tower.Looking at holding a Becher Skyhawk and Cushcraft XM-240 in the air at 55-75 feet.I have no problem with climbing but its hard for me to find someone to assist on the ground.Its hard for me to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00825.html (10,520 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:28:17 EDT; 70mph wind zone. The entire tower and mechanism is designed according to the UBC97 requirements, which are somewhat more severe than the more recent versions of the RS-222 standard. What's the RS-222; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00830.html (8,215 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: "W5LT" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:06:53 -0500; I am showing my age, Steve. The RS stds became TIA standards quite some time back, but old habits are hard to break. I was using it in reference to wind loadings, not structural design details. The U; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00841.html (8,035 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] fold over towers (score: 1): Author: N6FD <n6fd@mchsi.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:23:59 -0700; I got several replies on failures with the Rohn 45G foldover. It looks like Rohn did a modification to the design to beef up the strongback on the foldover. Thanks to Jim, K5LAD for some pictures sho; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00845.html (8,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]