Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Follow\s+up\s+on\s+AM\s+interference\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:58:54 -0800
Just discovered that when I switch the antenna tuner in, the interference goes away. H'mmmm Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00381.html (7,224 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:17:04 -0000
Sounds like front end overload or some kind of mixing inside the radio. Does your tuning/matching circuit on the vertical have some narrow band characteristics that is rejecting broadcast band stuff
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00385.html (8,853 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:25:39 -0600
HI, Tom; Are you using one of the typical TEE network tuners? They are typically high pass filters (two series capacitors and a shunt inductor) and may attenuate an AM broadcast signal when tuned to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00387.html (8,138 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:47:50 -0800
Hi Dave I actually made 2 posts, but didn't see the first one here. The first post said that I am having problems with AM broadcast interference with my 80 meter dipole that was never there before. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00391.html (7,910 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:52:20 -0800
Hi Tom, Can you identify the AM broadcast station(s) involved? These products are usually a mix, and can occur outside your own site. At my first QTH in WV, I had an intermod product from 930 kHz (5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00403.html (7,883 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:34:30 -0800
Hi JIm There is 1 on 1240 and 1 on 1340. I am about 1 mile from the one on 1240 and about 5 miles from 1340. I still think it is something in my antenna somewhere because it is nil on the vertical. 7
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00405.html (9,135 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:47:11 -0500
What frequency are you receiving it on 80 meters? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00406.html (8,433 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:58:47 -0600
I had the same problem one time and it was caused by a corroded connection on my rotor cable. Turn the radio up so you can hear it and start moving cables and tightening connections. That's how I fou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00407.html (10,197 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:01:07 -0800
HI Gary At 4005 and 3993 are the frequencies I noticed tonight. Also another one around 3800, but the station is either off the air now or they have reduced power 'cause I don't hear it right now. To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00414.html (8,717 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:40:06 -0600
Some years back, the Texas DX Society 2m repeater started getting severe interference from a commercial repeater in town (Houston). We found out who it was by the CW ID and our repeater guy talked wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00416.html (9,167 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:17:55 -0800
Go to the FCC website on the following link. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/ Click on the link for AM query, then plug in the lat/lon of your QTH at the section near the bottom of the form, with a dista
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00418.html (11,404 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:30:46 -0500
Do they have anything like that for all commercial towers within a given area? Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2 www.rogerhalstead.com _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00419.html (8,750 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:58:01 -0800
If they do, I haven't found it, and it was damned difficult to find this link. I stumbled onto it, and have never found a link to it from "the front door." But as you can see, there are links on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00438.html (8,925 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:25:27 -0700
For any Federal Regulation published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR as in CFR 97 or in HamSpeak, "Part 97") simply go to: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?sid=137ac1f5af132ae9b7
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00440.html (10,921 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:30:38 -0700
Correction to my last post. The first link takes you to the Dept. of Ed. Not exactly fascinating reading. Here is the link to Part 97. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=ce13680
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00441.html (12,210 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Follow up on AM interference (score: 1)
Author: dave.n7drk@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Try this link for FCC lookups... http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/genmen/index.hts Dave - N7DRK -- snip -- ____________________________________________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00453.html (8,561 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu