Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Roy & Peggy Bonvillian" <wd5dbv@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:34:27 -0500; I ordered a Delta 230/240 I was told it would take 8 weeks it took 17 weeks. Very hard to communicate with the company. WD5DBV Roy _______________________________________________ ____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00190.html (6,483 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:10:48 -0500; If you really were goning to copy something to build it for profit wouldn't you just BUY one and go from there.Thats what I would do. Force 12 may make great antennas but the few times I called them; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00683.html (6,718 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: Martin Staffa <geitaemort@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:00:40 -0700 (PDT); Wait months for an antenna. No will talk to you on the phone. Pay for a manual. WHY ARE YOU BUYING THIS ANTENNA!! Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to towertalk@contesting.com To subscribe or u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00682.html (24,695 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:09:44 +0000; W6RMK asked: In order to get a reasonable match, perhaps, but wouldn't being able to use one C-3 on >1 band simultaneously be a good reason to go with separate feeders? ;^) And there's a demanding te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00308.html (9,996 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "ChetMoore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:50:53 -0500; My C31XR came with the insulators/spacers. After seeing some comments about big winds whipping elements around. I noticed that if i worked at it and while the antenna was on the groound that I could; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00306.html (17,825 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:38:34 -0500; Force12talk@qth.com. I administer the mailing list, and I can tell you, fairly categorically, that I have not seen such a report on that list. 73, Pete N4ZR At 03:06 PM 11/10/2004, Jerry Keller wrote; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00304.html (12,238 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:06:10 -0500; Is there a reflector dedicated to Force 12 antennas, where users can get information like that? 73, Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net> To: <jimjarvis@com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00302.html (11,109 bytes)
8. RE: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:54:13 -0000; As I recall Force 12 shipped a bunch of C4XL's with wrong 15m driven elements due to a laser printer mis-printing a dimension on the drawing. Of course to get this information you have to call and if; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00301.html (9,180 bytes)
9. RE: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:29:05 -0600; ROTFLMAO! Bet that would bend a few meter needles. <grin> Keith NM5G And there's a demanding test for the IP3 of all of your receivers' front ends... I assume you plan on running a kilowatt on each b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00300.html (10,120 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:48:12 -0800; At 03:59 PM 11/10/2004 +0000, VR2BrettGraham wrote: N4ZR added: There have been lots of reports of single feed problems with the C-31XR (and lots of people who are quite happy with the single feed) b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00298.html (8,975 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:59:25 +0000; N4ZR added: There have been lots of reports of single feed problems with the C-31XR (and lots of people who are quite happy with the single feed) but the idea of needing to feed a C-3 with 3 separate; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00295.html (8,466 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:07:33 -0500; -- Original Message -- From: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net> To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; "Darrel J. Van Buer" <darrel@vanbuer.net>; <jimjarvis@comcast.net> Cc: "Towertalk" <towertalk@conte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00294.html (14,952 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:59:06 -0500; I have had two C-3E's for 7-10 years, and have never noticed excessive SWR change with frequency, or SWR fluctuations with wind of more than .1 or so. The antennas are within the SWR spec all the way; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00292.html (9,763 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:41:46 -0500; TT: I have a Bencher Skyhawk with the older open sleeve feed system (similar to F12's. Ahem!) Both F12 and Bencher Yagi's have available a set of phenolic spacers that keep the DEs in the same spatia; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00291.html (12,448 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:56:47 -0800; operating on 15m? There is a C4XL which we finally gave up on after two years and put in three separate feedlines. Then, we gave up on that and replaced it with an optibeam. Works great. never tuned,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00290.html (10,060 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: "Darrel J. Van Buer" <darrel@vanbuer.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:39:56 -0800; I had a lot of trouble tuning 10m once with a C4XL (and changing element length was really bizarre - small changes act as expected, but at some point there would be a big jump to a wildly different r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00289.html (8,399 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: jimjarvis@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:29:15 +0000; Ok...I stand corrected. .....Force 12 has fallen upon its own sword, which apparently was assembled with pop rivets which held just fine. Seriously, has anyone had difficulty with their 3 band matchi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00286.html (7,085 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed Mar 26 09:24:28 2003; Well, we tested the C-3 (a C-4XL is a C-3 plus 2 elements on 40) for our tribander comparison report - it played very well. The report was just reviewed by LB Cebik, W4RNL, in the April QST. It's ava; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00356.html (6,791 bytes)
19. [TowerTalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: cqki8fh@juno.com (dan r goddard); Date: Wed Mar 26 08:18:41 2003; Considering buying a C-4XL. Has anyone had any experience with this antenna? Thanks Dan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00355.html (6,223 bytes)
20. [Towertalk] Force 12 (score: 1): Author: smlx@earthlink.net (Nancy & Steve Lawrence); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:18:40 -0700; I have a Force 12 WARC 7. It's 2 el on 30 and 17 and 3 el on 12m. It's 10 feet below a TH7. The booms are parallel. Both antennas work very well. I'm not aware of any interaction. If there is any aff; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00251.html (7,239 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]