Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+5BA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+5BA\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Bill Jackson" <k9rz@radiks.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:26:49 -0500; Looking for comments, pro or con about the Force-12 5BA as a replacement for an aging KLM KT34XA. I realize it requires three seperate feedlines, but adding a remote coax switch at the top of the tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00847.html (6,720 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:10:09 -0400; Have you looked at the StepIR 3 or 4 elem? Much better antenna. I just put up a 4 elem and I can't believe the performance. I think the 3 elem is about the some price and has a smaller foot print and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00848.html (8,015 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:14:31 +0100; It's not suitable in a breezy location, the closely spaced elements wave around and touch each other, then the VSWR goes up and my amp trips out. Tony _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00849.html (8,117 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: Jim <kj0m@mchsi.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:35:11 -0500; Hi, Bill. I've had a 5BA up for 3 years now in SD. No problems and works very well. It's mounted on a US Tower 72' retractable tower just above the thrust bearing. It's big, but easily built and has; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00850.html (8,189 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:38:42 -0400; Bill, I run a 5BA at 73 ft. Use a coax switch to handle the three feed lines. It works as advertised with no moving parts (except the rotator). I'd buy another if I ever needed to. __________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00851.html (9,080 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:38:48 +0100; Whoops, sorry but I meant that comment about the Force 12 5BA but quoted the wrong post. I have no comment to make on the SteppIR antennas. Tony _______________________________________________ See: h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00852.html (7,906 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:47:42 -0400; Hmm.. Interesting. I hadn't notice that with my 3 el. Not breezy enough here? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless We; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00853.html (9,260 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:04:54 +0100; My wrong, that comment was about the 5BA. Fluid Motion insulated plastic tubes couldn't have that "feature" even if they could bend that far. Tony _______________________________________________ See; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00854.html (8,441 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:09:15 -0400; Yes, but I replied to the first message, and found the later one ..erm... later. -- Original Message -- From: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk> To: "Towertalk Mailing List" <towerta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00855.html (9,388 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:57:20 +0000; They actually touch? Wow - didn't realize some of the elements were _that_ close. F-12 sleeves plus aggressive taper does result in SWR wiggles, but that must be some serious breeze as even on C-3E/A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00867.html (8,483 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1): Author: "Bill Jackson" <k9rz@radiks.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:07:58 -0600; Thanks to everyone for all the good info. I have a few months to research the best alternatives as winter will soon be here. 73 de Bill for an aging KLM KT34XA. I realize it requires three seperate f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00086.html (8,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]