Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+B\-1\/B\-1S\s+Baluns\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: rfman45 <rfman45@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 18:07:58 -0500
I'd like to hear from users of the Force 12 B-1 and B-1/S baluns about their general durability and especially their use for RTTY. I've looked in the archives but don't see a whole lot about them. Fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00144.html (7,475 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 16:55:36 -0700
Mark, IMO the power dissipated in the Balun will be related to the coax termination impedance at the antenna. If it sees 50 ohms then there will be little current coming back down the shield outer .
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00147.html (8,182 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 12:24:29 +0100
Even with a perfect 50 Ohm antenna, there can be significant coax braid current and stress on any balun that is installed! With a perfect 50 Ohm antenna, at the 1500W level the differential-mode feed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00152.html (8,373 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Colello" <colellos@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 09:05:07 -0400
I have been running them for about 6 years with no problem on a C4SXL. Many times at full legal on RTTY and in many RTTY contests. Steve KA2KON -- Original Message -- From: "rfman45" <rfman45@hotmail
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00154.html (8,987 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 05:30:18 -0700
Even with a perfect 50 Ohm antenna, there can be significant coax braid current and stress on any balun that is installed! With a perfect 50 Ohm antenna, at the 1500W level the differential-mode feed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00166.html (10,089 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:53:15 +0100
If the choke is primarily reactive, and the coax braid impedance is also reactive but the opposite sign, adding the choke may *reduce* the net CM path impedance and *increase* the braid current. Maki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00167.html (8,262 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:56:58 -0700
Steve has given you the right answer to this. Current squared x resistive ohms = lotsa heat. Not if the current is small enough. And since power is current squared but the current is inversely propo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00173.html (9,695 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:57:28 -0700
If the choke is primarily reactive, and the coax braid impedance is also reactive but the opposite sign, adding the choke may *reduce* the net CM path impedance and *increase* the braid current. Maki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00175.html (9,698 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:13:24 +0100
Yes, the choke reactance may add to the coax braid reactance producing an increase in the net CM impedance; in fact with certain lengths of coax the braid impedance is high enough that you don't need
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00176.html (10,071 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:28:54 +0100
All true; and with a well designed ferrite-loaded choke it is exactly the opposite. A common-mode (choking) impedance of several kohms can easily be maintained across a 2:1 frequency ratio. The big a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00178.html (10,311 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Tom H Childers <n5ge@n5ge.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:50:14 -0500
One reason those folks, which has included me have done that, is because most loaded Yagi-Uda antennas sold by CushCraft and others recommend doing just that in the assembly instructions! [snip] [sni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00180.html (9,119 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:58:43 -0600
Okay so how do you route the coax back to the mast from the driven element then? Dangle the coax below the mast? Add another choke at the mast? But wait! The mast is metal too! Just how much of a pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00181.html (10,294 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:01:47 -0600
Oops, I meant dangle the coax below the boom. Chris _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00182.html (11,055 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:06:46 +0100
Below the feedline choke, the outside of the coax is (or should be) almost completely dead to RF, so it can then be taped to the metalwork without further problems. But taping the choke itself onto t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00183.html (12,728 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:13:09 -0700
I have built and measured several of the K9YC choke designs with similar results to his. However, you can achieve resistances of several thousand ohms in a less clumsy way. I use the small teflon die
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00187.html (15,493 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:13:26 -0600
The wood spacer is a good idea, maybe Jim can chime in on how much spacing is needed. This is a real problem with double boom log periodics since both booms are hot with RF, and running the coax alon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00188.html (12,772 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: Tom H Childers <n5ge@n5ge.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:53:57 -0500
Balun Designs is about 30 miles north of me and he made one for me while I watched. The drive was well worth seeing the careful detail and workmanship he puts into his balun's. http://www.balundesign
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00197.html (9,550 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:51:02 -0400 (EDT)
capacitance between one side of the driven element and the boom. In other words, taping the "choke balun" directly to the boom is making the antenna more UNbalanced! It's amazing to watch people doi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00199.html (8,225 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:31:40 -0400
In the past year, I have made and measured (on a network analyzer) seven choke baluns, made of multiple turns (5 to 7) of RG-142 through multiple cores (3 to 5, 2.4" OD) of type 31 material, all depe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00200.html (10,195 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:42:21 -0700
capacitance between one side of the driven element and the boom. In other words, taping the "choke balun" directly to the boom is making the antenna more UNbalanced! It's amazing to watch people doin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-05/msg00201.html (10,574 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu