Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+C\-31XR\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: w4gd@bellsouth.net (John W. Morris)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 14:24:43 -0500
I have a Force 12 C-31XR enroute to me. Would appreciate hearing from anyone who has assembled one of these. How long did assembly take? Is the instruction manual reasonably clear? Did you run into a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00945.html (7,168 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 18:57:42 +0000
Curious... Is there enough room between elements to mount one on a TIC Ringrotor? 73 Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club -- FAQ on WWW: http://w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00957.html (7,615 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 22:17:56 -0500
Hi, On my C31XR there is 29.5 inches clearance (not center-to-center) between the forward element of the 10 m feed cell and the 1st 15m director. The center of this space is about 12 inches forward o
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00966.html (9,399 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 18:23:49 EDT
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- Just finished installing a new C-31XR for Jon, K7ZA, and thought I'd give a couple of impressions. The antenna mechanically is typical Force 12 which is to say excellent. Ther
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00683.html (8,745 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:29:14 -0400
Now I'm confused....why should you need feedline to make the SWR good? I also wonder if the other antennas might be affecting your 15 meter SWR...particularly that WARC antenna 6 feet away. Perhaps 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00698.html (9,733 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:49:17 EDT
<< This antenna can NOT be tuned on the tower - it needs 100 feet of feedline per the manual to make the curves look good. The antenna was mounted about six feet below a CC A3WS and twelve feet below
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00700.html (7,938 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:01:35 EDT
That's a question for Tom to answer. It could be destructive interaction. I didn't turn the A3WS 90 degrees to see if anything changed. The SWR does go to about 1.2:1 at resonance so I suspect the DE
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00708.html (7,928 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:14:08 -0400
This was discussed in the QST review of the C-3, from which the C-31XR is derived -- it requires the loss in 100ft of coax to widen the SWR curve sufficiently to meet spec at the band edges. More to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00711.html (8,050 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-31XR (score: 1)
Author: force12@interserv.com (force12@interserv.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Good morning. Haven't located the original beginning of this thread, but will jump in here! First, the 100' feedline comment in the our manuals is not a big deal. Referencing a feedline length was no
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00717.html (9,421 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu