Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+C3\s+series\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force\s+12\s+C3\s+series\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 Series (score: 1): Author: Swilsonac6@aol.com (Swilsonac6@aol.com); Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 22:58:52 EST; A few months ago I started a thread on the C3 series of force 12 antennas. I benefited from the posted and private responses to my query I ended up buying the C-3E version which is the original C3 wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00422.html (7,484 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: Swilsonac6@aol.com (Swilsonac6@aol.com); Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:53:21 EDT; I am about to finally put up a triband beam (about 40 ft up) and having decided to purchace a Force 12 C3 am having a problem deciding to buy the regular C3 or the shortened (cheaper/smaller) C3S. Ex; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00580.html (7,821 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 13:09:26 EDT; << I guess my question is -- Does anyone with real experience with these antennas have any reason one should buy a C3S instead of a full size C3 (except the slightly narrower 10M bandwith) ?? >> For; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00582.html (7,605 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 22:38:06 -0400; antennas (except the They all work FB. I was just convinced to pass on a nice used C3S because I was told by my Elmer that boom length is critical to gain and the C3S is way too short to claim gain; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00608.html (8,022 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: wmhandy@pacificnet.net (William E. Handy Jr. - K6LF); Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 21:44:53 -0700; David, I'll share with you and the TowerTalkians the swr curve of my C-3 that I just put up last weekend at 52 feet very near the side of my single story home. I used the default mid-band element len; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00618.html (10,695 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:07:45 -0600; N4KG comments follow questions and first response. ///////////////////////////////////// This is a case where a little knowledge is dangerous. Both the C3 and C3S act as 2 element Yagi's on each band; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00628.html (10,255 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 09:45:41 EDT; You and everyone else. Expecting any yagi to cover 1.7 mHz of bandwidth with low SWR is an unrealistic expectation. Since the lower 2:1 point is down in the 27 mHz range, perhaps Tom could tell you h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00637.html (8,184 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 series (score: 1): Author: Swilsonac6@aol.com (Swilsonac6@aol.com); Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 20:27:35 EST; Thanks for all the responses via the sig or direct E mail to my query about which of the Force 12 C3 antennas I should buy!! It was great to hear from folks with some real world experience with these; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00961.html (7,498 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]